Good evening. Planning
commissioners, members of the
public and staff members. I
would like to call this hybrid
public meeting to order for.
Thursday, May 21st, 2026. My
name is Carl Johnson. I'm the
chairman of the Clark County
Planning Commission. The role
of the Planning Commission is
to review and analyze
comprehensive plan amendments,
zoning changes, and other land
related issues. We follow a
public process, including
holding hearings, during which
the public has an opportunity
to provide additional
perspectives and information
and legislative matters. The
role of the Planning Commission
is advisory. The county Council
will hold separate hearings,
consider our recommendations,
and then they will make a final
determination. The Planning
Commission tonight will conduct
a public hearing and take
testimony. All public comments
received before tonight's
hearing have been sent to the
Planning Commission members and
entered into the public record.
County staff will present first
and then Planning Commission
can ask questions. Next, we
will invite the applicant to
speak if there is one, and then
members of the public who wish
to provide testimony. When we
get to the public comment
portion of our agenda, we will
provide some more specific
information on how to
participate both virtually and
in person. However, if you are
in person tonight and wish to
provide a comment on the agenda
item, please sign up via the
sheets in the back of the room.
During public testimony, staff
and the applicant may respond
to comments, and the public
portion of the hearing will
then be closed. The Planning
Commission will then deliberate
and make a recommendation to
the county council for both
virtual and in-person members
of the Planning Commission and
staff. Please ensure that your
microphones are muted unless
you are speaking. Planning
commissioners. When you make a
motion or a second of a motion,
please state your name for the
court reporter. Conflicts of
interest. Do any members of the
Planning Commission have any
conflicts related to tonight's
hearing items? Hearing none, we
will now get a roll call in any
introduction of guests. Jeff,
can we get a roll call?
>> Brian Halbert here. Mark
Bergthold here. Kyle Fadness
here. Ron Baka here. Jack.
Karen here. Alicia Montgomery,
Carl Johnson here.
>> Next, we'll get approval for
the agenda for May 21st, 2006.
Can I get a motion please?
>> Commissioner Brian Halbert
so moved.
>> So I have a motion. May I
get a second?
>> Commissioner Harroun second.
>> So we have a motion for
approval of agenda for May 21st,
2006. Jeff, can we please get a
roll call?
>> Ryan Halbert.
>> I.
>> Mark Bergfeld. I Kyle
Fadness I Ron Barca. I Jack
Harroun. I Carl Johnson. I six
zero.
>> Motion passes. Next we'll be
looking for approval for the
minutes from March 19th, 2026.
May I have a motion please?
>> This is Ron Barca. Motion to
approve the minutes as written.
>> May I have a second.
>> Commissioner Fadness second.
>> We have a motion and a
second for approval of minutes
from March 19th, 2026. Can we
get a roll call, Jeff?
>> Brian Howard.
>> I.
>> Mark Bergfeld. I Kyle
Fadness. I Ron Barca. I Chad
Karen. I Carl Johnson. I six
zero.
>> Motion passes. With that
said we'll now go and
communication from the public
for items that are not listed I
repeat not listed on the agenda.
Is there any any online public
comment on things that aren't
on the agenda on tonight? Yours
is not on the agenda. Come.
Yeah, come on up. Yeah. Just
make sure you state your name
for the court reporter.
>> Good evening commissioners.
My name is Christian Volk. I'm
a ten year Vancouver resident.
>> I can't hear him.
>> One second. Cyndie. We'll
get it on just the button. Can
you push the button? Yeah.
Sorry about that. Thank you.
How's this? Yeah. There you go.
>> Let me start over. Good
evening. Commissioners. My name
is Christian Volk. I'm a ten
year Vancouver resident. Three
years ago, my partner and I
successfully launched a
preschool in Kitsap County. And
we want to bring that same
investment home to Clark County.
The Washington Department of
Children, Youth and Families
designates Clark County a child
care desert with a documented
shortage of licensed slots
relative to the number of
children who need care. This
isn't just a social issue, it's
a critical infrastructure and
workforce constraint for our
county. I'm here tonight to
urge the Commission to address
a specific regulatory gap in
the current Comprehensive Plan
update. The City of Vancouver
is actively updating its zoning
code to comply with CW3521996,
which took effect July 27th,
2025, establishing a clear
state expectation for
conditional use permits in
light industrial, zoning and
employment zones. But when I
brought a potential property to
county planning staff, I was
told the current code
explicitly prohibits dedicated
child care centers in that zone
and that there are no plans to
update it. The result is a
regulatory void. Families and
providers face completely
different rules on opposite
sides of an invisible line
within the same Vancouver Urban
growth area. Under the Growth
Management Act, the county's
comprehensive plan must be
coordinated with the City of
Vancouver for lands within the
shared UGA, a standard. The
current gap fails to meet other
GMA planning counties,
including Kitsap and Pierce,
are actively integrating these
industrial zone provisions to
support their local workforces.
My request is technical and
specific. I ask that this
commission formally recommend a
text amendment to title 40
during this update cycle to
allow child care centers as a
conditional use within light,
industrial and employment zones
inside urban growth areas,
bringing Clark County into
alignment with the City of
Vancouver and the clear
legislative intent of state
land use policy. Thank you.
>> Thank you for your comments.
Any questions regarding that?
>> He spell his last name.
>> Would you.
>> V like Victor OLK.
>> Let me just say that. Mark,
did you have a comment first?
>> Yeah, this Commissioner
Roeun, if you wouldn't mind
emailing that or even that
whole whole spiel to us,
because that would be
worthwhile. And maybe we can
get some staff or something to
look at, look at that and what
that process.
>> Would be happy to do that.
Thank you.
>> Yeah.
>> Thank you. So yeah, go ahead.
You might want to give the
instructions if.
>> For attendees using their
computer or WebEx application.
If you would like to speak,
please use the raise hand icon
for attendees using the
Telephone Audio only option,
press star three on your
phone's number panel to raise
your hand. For those in person
that would like to provide
comment, please raise your hand.
Once acknowledged, we already
have had the people in the in
the hearing room. Public
comments are limited to three
minutes per person in order to
accommodate all speakers. Again,
this portion of tonight's
hearing is only for items not
listed on tonight's agenda. For
those who are online, please
raise your hand and we will
call on you to make your
comment. Okay. Nobody is
raising their hand online.
>> So all right.
>> No one's online. No one else
in the audience has to say
anything that's not on there.
Okay, with that said, we'll
close that part of the
communication from the public
for items not listed on the
agenda. We'll now move into the
public hearing items. Some
reminders if you are providing
public testimony in person, of
course. Please sign up on the
sheet in the back. If you're
joining remotely once again,
we'll probably give those
instructions again. Tonight,
we're going to be talking about
recommendation to the Clark
County Council on the 2026
Clark County Stormwater Code
and Manual adoption staff
presentation is Devin Stauffer
if I pronounce that right, the
Clean Water Division manager,
Devin. Make sure you state your
name and spell it, if you may.
>> Great. Thank you. Good
evening, planning commissioners.
My name is Devin Rastorfer. It
is spelled DEVANROSTORER, and
I'm the Clean Water Division
manager for Clark County Public
Works. And today we are here
for a final work session on the
20. Well, sorry, it's not a
work session. My apologies.
I'll start over today. We are
here as a follow up to our work
session later, earlier this
month to provide to request
council or. I am so sorry to
request the Planning Commission
to recommend adoption to Clark
County Council for the 2026
Clark County Stormwater Code
Manual, and I am joined here
today by Tryston Lebowsky from
otak, who I will now have
introduce herself.
>> Good evening. My name is
Tryston from otak. Should I
spell my name as well? Okay,
Trista is TRISTACKOBLUSKIE, and
I'm a senior Stormwater planner
and Project Manager. For the
code and manual update.
>> Great, thank you. And our
agenda for today is we're going
to provide some background on
the stormwater code manual. And
we're also going to provide an
overview of the public
involvement process. And from
our work session on May 7th, we
received some questions from
the Planning Commission that we
would like to follow up on. And
then our proposed action for
today is that the Planning
Commission. Sorry, I am
struggling. The Planning
Commission recommend County
Council to adopt the revised
stormwater code and manual, and
that is done through adoption
of an ordinance that amends
four chapters of Clark County
Code, which we will spell out
later in this presentation. So
with that, I will now hand it
over to Trista to go into the
background.
>> Okay. Next slide please. And
next slide. The update we are
talking about today, which you
heard about in the work session
a couple of weeks ago, is
pertinent to the county's
municipal stormwater permit,
which is issued by the
Department of Ecology,
Washington Department of
Ecology under the federal Clean
Water Act. The act prohibits
discharge of the county's storm
sewer discharges into waters of
the state without a permit, so
this permit gives the
conditions under which the
county can discharge stormwater
to waters of the state. And to
clarify, this is a phase one
municipal stormwater permit.
There's a phase two as well,
but this is phase one. And next
slide, please. The permit
requires the county to have
storm engineering standards,
stormwater standards that apply
in the development scenario and
a redevelopment scenario. The
standards need to be updated
approximately every five years
after the permit is renewed.
Recent updates were in 2015,
when the county first published
a standalone manual, and in
2021, when the first update of
that standalone manual occurred,
we would expect that the county
would need to update its
stormwater standards again in
about five years. When the next
permit is issued in 2029. The
permit requires these standards
to be in effect on July 1st,
2026, so we are headed quickly
toward that permit due date.
And the main concept for these
stormwater standards is that
they need to be equivalent to
the 2024 Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington,
which is published by the
Department of Ecology and
contains the majority of the
the thresholds, the selection
criteria and the engineering
design criteria for these, as
well as source control and
maintenance standards. Next
slide please. So the materials
in front of you today for the
hearing are voluminous. So just
to underscore what they are for
the moment, you've got four
books of the Clark County
Stormwater Manual. The first
book has the thresholds,
applicability and BMP selection
criteria. The second book is
more technical in nature and
contains the engineering design
standards for drainage, water
quality and flow control
facilities. The third book is
Source Control, which prevents
pollutants from coming into
contact with stormwater runoff.
And then the fourth book is
Operations and Maintenance. So
between us, between these, you
have a lot to look over. We did
provide them in both strikeout
and underline, highlighting the
changes for your review, as
well as a clean version of the
drafts. Next slide please. So
the manual becomes county code
because it is adopted in title
40. It's adopted in chapter
4386, which is dedicated to
stormwater and erosion control.
This chapter requires these
measures at certain thresholds
of development or redevelopment,
and it talks about the
particular standards for
construction, development and
redevelopment. The manual is
also adopted in chapter 1326 A
water quality. This is an
environmental regulation that
limits the discharge of
pollutants on existing
properties, or really anywhere
in the county, and we are also
amending title 40, chapter 100
General Provisions and 4500
Overview of procedures. There's
language in those chapters
about expiration dates and
vesting and definitions. Pardon
me. Next slide. And I will turn
it over to Devin to recap the
proposed action.
>> Thank you. And I'll try to
get it right this time I
apologize. So our proposed
action today is to request the
Planning Commission to make a
recommendation to Clark County
Council to adopt an ordinance
that revises the following
codes. Chapter 40 .386
Stormwater and Erosion Control.
Chapter 1326 A Water Quality.
Chapter 40 .100 General
Provisions and chapter 40 dot
500 Overview of Procedures and
the ordinance adoption would
make the 2026 Clark County
Stormwater Code and Manual
effective on July 1st of 2026.
And on the next slide, Trista
did a great job at going over
this, but I wanted to just add
a bit more on the hearing
materials that are in front of
you. Part of the reason that
this, the entirety wasn't
printed is because books one,
two, three, and four are 1000
plus pages. So we hope that you
had a chance to take a look at
them online. And the county
code revisions are pretty
extensive as well. And we've
included those four chapters.
And in addition to these
materials, you also have a memo
that we wrote to Clark County
Council and transmitted on May
13th. And that was into
response to in response to some
of the questions they had at a
prior work session. And if
there are questions on that
memo, we can go into them later.
But I do want to thank Katie
Jolma, who's here, our
prosecuting attorney, who has
went through everything with us
and made sure everything was
legally sound. And in addition,
you have a staff report. We've
also included a Department of
Ecology preliminary approval
letter, and they've also issued
a letter of equivalency that
confirms that our 2026 Clark
County stormwater code and
manual is equivalent to
Washington State's Western or
Western Washington Stormwater
Manual. We also have submitted
the code revisions to
Department of Commerce for
review and additionally, the
CPA determination of
non-significant comment process,
I believe concluded today. We
only received one comment, and
it was actually from a tribe in
the Puget Sound that declined
to comment, but appreciated
that they were notified and
given the opportunity. We've
also included a table of the
comments and responses that we,
the comments we've received and
how we've responded to them.
And I mentioned the memo
already, but if you have any
questions about the materials,
we're happy to take those at
the end.
>> All right. Next slide please.
I will run through our
engagement process and the
schedule we kept through this
process that we undertook to
get us where we are today. So
our schedule was really driven
by two ecology deadlines. The
primary one is the one upcoming
that I mentioned before. These
standards have to be in effect
by July 1st, 2026. We also had
a deadline in June of 2025,
when we needed to submit our
early proposals to Department
of Ecology for their review so
that they could issue those
that determination of
equivalency that Devin
mentioned before. So we began
in the fall or winter of 2024,
gathering the requests for
updates to the manual,
reviewing the required changes
that Department of Ecology gave
us that are applicable to all
phase one permits and engaging
the community. So we really
started by collating all these
things, but then talking to the
Development and Engineering
Advisory Board or Dbw starting
in October. We also engaged a
wide community from inside the
county staff, including the
Clean Water Division. Of course,
other public works staff from
engineering and operations,
those who inspect stormwater
facilities. We also engage
staff from community
development as they are the
ones who review the planning
and engineering applications
that are developed to meet the
standards of the Clark County
Stormwater Manual. So we spoke
to quite a quite an array of
staff during this time period.
We continue to engage deep and
staff until that June 2025
deadline, when we submitted our
proposals to ecology. And then
we continued to work on some
other updates until December of
last year. And at that time, we
had a limited public
involvement period where we
invited Dbw and the Clean Water
Commission to comment on on our
earliest public draft. And then
we went through, excuse me,
sorry about that. We went
through a general public
involvement period this spring,
which is concluding now,
essentially with the Planning
Commission hearing. And we're
moving toward adoption by the
due date that the permit gives
us. Next slide please. I did
want to speak just a little bit
more about how much Dbw was
involved. We thank them for
their continuous involvement
through this process. They saw
our early language proposals,
gave us a lot of input and
feedback. They had certain
requests themselves, and then
we met with them, I think seven
times throughout the this 18
month period. And again, they
had that invited public comment
period in December. We received
several comments from Dbw this
spring when we released the
most recent draft, and we have
been able to incorporate many
of those comments. So they've
really helped shape, you know,
the proposals that you see in
front of you today, as well as
the Clean Water Commission.
Next slide please. Through the
18 months, I would say we've
received so many good comments,
very little disagreement with
what we've been proposing.
We've been able to incorporate
so many of the requests. And we
yeah, we thank the community. I
will next slide please. So just
a little bit more detail about
what we heard. The Clean Water
Commission gave us about 200
very technical comments from
our December public comment
period, and we've incorporated
many of those. And the more
extensive comments we are
saving until the next update in
service of the county's desire
for continuous improvement of
this manual. And then in our
general public comment period,
we have received 13 comments
from Dbw and the development
community, and we've been able
to incorporate eight of those
requests back into the manual.
And I can talk about those in
more detail in the next slide.
So due to the public comment
that we got this spring, we
reversed two of our early
proposals, one of which was a
restriction of of putting
stormwater treatment facilities
on individual residential lots
in the urban area. This was to
protect those property owners
from being responsible for
shared stormwater facilities
that serve multiple properties.
That was the purpose of that.
But the community asked for
more flexibility. So we
reversed that proposal. And the
language is now just as it is
in the 2021 stormwater manual,
where this is allowed, with the
caveat is we've put a
preference that those types of
facilities that are shared
would be located on a tract
rather than an individual lot.
But it's a preference, not a
requirement. And then another
proposal that we reversed,
thanks to the community's input,
was a proposed restriction on
using a particular type of
stormwater facility on
driveways because of problems
that we observed over the past
years. Again, the community
asked for that to be restored
because it's an important BMP.
So that language, the allowance
for that to be used on
driveways is restored in the
draft that's in front of you,
and instead, the county will be
focusing on training to make
sure those are installed
properly. We clarified some
things that, through comments
we realized were being
misconstrued. So we clarified
that basic treatment is not
required for on site downspout
control Upkes and we clarified
some modeling requirements. And
also thanks to the Clean Water
Commission, we added a
provision that had been missing
for quite a while in the manual,
which is setbacks to property
from certain stormwater
facilities. And then we added
some other minor clarifications
and exemptions. All right. Next
slide please. So as Devin
mentioned, we've reached some
important milestones in this
process. We have received
preliminary approval letter
from Ecology in December, and
the county received the
preliminary equivalency
determination in March. The DNS
has Ziply has closed and with a
determination of
Non-significance. So this is
this. These standards are
intended to be protective of
the environment. So we hope
they do not have a negative
impact. And then the Department
of Commerce review, because
this is change to a development
regulation is ongoing. And that
was submitted in April. Next
slide please. All right. So
since we had a work session two
weeks ago, we had a couple of
comments from the commissioners
during that work session. And
one, we didn't answer in the
moment. So this is the
outstanding question, which was
from you, Commissioner Haroon.
You questioned whether for
submittals that exceed 5000ft²
of impervious surface or hard
surfaces, if you needed to,
professionals, both a
geotechnical engineer and a
civil engineer to submit your
stormwater site plan. The
answer it is. It is required in
the Western Washington Manual.
So if your site plan requires
engineering and once you reach
that 500 zero square foot
threshold, you would be
triggering minimum requirement
six for runoff treatment and
minimum requirement seven for
flow control. The creating
facilities for those or
designing facilities to meet
those minimum requirements
requires the practice of
engineering, so your stormwater
site plan does need to be
prepared by a civil engineer.
As far as the infiltration and
site investigations, those need
to be prepared by a civil
engineer or a geotechnical
engineer. It could actually be
the same professional. The
trick might be finding a
professional who was
comfortable both doing the site
investigation, the geotechnical
investigation and stamping.
Excuse me. And stamping your
stormwater site design. So it's
not technically required, but I
think in effect, it ends up
being. Yeah.
>> So clarification on that.
The I was trying to find the
definition of the qualified
professional. And there was
trying to jump back between a
lot of pages. So, so. The
qualified professional is a
civil engineer. Is that as far
as the stormwater, the
Washington state stormwater
manual, because it doesn't it
doesn't say civil engineer says
qualified professional. And so
I was just trying to really
ferret out who a qualified
professional is and how that's
bracketed.
>> The the Clark County Emanual
does it address it slightly
differently than the Western
Washington Manual? So in the
Clark County manual, qualified
professional. And I, I don't
have the exact definition in
front of me, but it does depend
on context. So there's a list
of qualified professionals, but
it depends on context. So if
you're doing geotechnical work,
it has to be someone who is
qualified to do geotechnical
work. And if it is civil
engineering, it has to be
someone who is qualified. So
there is such a thing as a
civil engineer who has a
geotechnical expertise, and if
that person were comfortable
doing so, they could both
supervise the site
investigation and prepare the
stormwater site plan where
they're sizing your stormwater
facilities.
>> So but it does come down to
stamp. So they have to the the
ability, like the Geotech has
to be able to stamp it. The.
Versus like hiring a geologist
versus.
>> I mean, a geologist,
geotechnical engineer,
Hydrogeologist would all be
considered qualified
professionals for the site
investigation or a civil
engineer who has expertise in
geology.
>> Thank you.
>> You're welcome. Okay. And
I'm going to turn it back over
to Devin to close out our
portion of the hearing.
>> Great. Thank you. Trista, at
this point, the next step after
today's hearing is a public
hearing with Clark County
Council. And this is just a
reiteration of the materials
that will be brought before
council and that are being
brought forth to you today. And
on the next slide, I'm just
going to reiterate again the
proposed action before we get
into any additional questions.
But today we are on the next
slide requesting again your
recommendation to Clark County
Council to adopt the stormwater
code manual by through adoption
of an ordinance that revises
those four chapters of Clark
County Code. I will offer that
we had our final work session
with council yesterday and it
went really well. We went
through the manual, which was
essentially us answering the
questions that they had, and
there weren't any further
questions that I thought were
substantial. They were really
appreciative of our engagement
of Dbw at at least seven times
throughout the process. And I
really believe that's why we
received only 13 comments. And
of that, you know, D wasn't the
full 13 comments. And so I
really want to thank Dbw as
well for working with us
throughout the process. And,
and I'm glad that we were able
to take their feedback and
incorporate those final changes
and reverse some of the things
we were proposing as a result
of their comments. And I'm
happy to share anything more.
If you have questions about the
work session yesterday or the
manual. But I just want to
thank you for your time and
look forward to your comments.
>> Outstanding. Thank you very
much. It was a very good
presentation. With that said,
is there any questions from the
commission? I'll bring it back
here for staff. Mr. Barca.
>> Commissioner Barca, I don't
actually have a question. I
just wanted to comment on the
fact that I heard from a couple
of individual professionals in
the field talking about the
work that you did with engaging
with Dbw and the idea of the
turnaround on the Cavs issue,
specifically about how
extremely long rural driveways
were going to have a very
significant impact. And you
took a second look at that and
made that better for everybody.
So I wanted to just say really
good job in the context of
outreach and listening. Thank
you.
>> Thank you. Any others?
>> Yeah, I was going to just
reiterate that as far as thank
you for working with the with
the advisory committee, because
it they really are people that
are just dealing with this
daily. And, and I know you guys
are always as well. And so
those things make. They
sometimes they seem so
innocuous on paper and in the
field, it's completely
different. So very much
appreciate that. Thank you.
>> Any other comments? Okay.
Seeing no more questions. Do we
have any excuse me, do we have
any people wishing to testify
either in the building or
online? Jeff.
>> Right.
>> Please note to be a party of
record, you must submit written
testimony before, during, or
prior to the close of tonight's
hearing or provide oral
testimony at the public hearing
or request in writing to be a
party of record. If written
comments were received prior to
May 21st, 2026, they were
submitted to the Planning
Commission members and posted
on the Planning Commission
website. Tonight's hearing is
being transcribed by a court
reporter, so please spell your
first and last name and speak
slowly. Public comment time is
limited to three minutes. We
will now begin with those
participants that have joined
remotely via computer or
telephone. Please raise your
virtual hand or press star
three on your phone to let us
know you would like to provide
comment. For those using the
telephone options, press star
six on your phone to unmute.
Unmute yourself when it is your
turn to speak. Okay, nobody has
raised their hand online. We
will now begin with
participants in the hearing
room. Would you like to speak
on on hearing items? No. All
right. That concludes public
comment.
>> Okay. Hearing that or lack
of, we will bring it back to
the Planning Commission for
deliberations and or a motion.
>> Chair, I have a point of
order on this trying to
understand are we going ahead
to approve this specifically by
chapter?
>> I didn't think that that was
going to be the way we were
doing. I thought we were going
to do it by in a whole, whole
manner.
>> All chapters at one time.
>> Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Unless you
have a different take on that.
>> I just wanted to clearly
understand that it wasn't a
separate vote between chapters
and the books as presented.
>> To us. Oh very good. Yeah,
yeah, just just on what's just
on what is presented here, what
the recommendation here is.
>> Okay. That being said, I'm
willing to make a motion to
approve the four chapters of
code revision as proposed by
staff.
>> May I get a second for that
motion, please.
>> Mr. Commissioner Haroon,
I'll second that motion.
>> So we have a motion and a
second on the table to approve
recommendations for Clark
County Council's 2026
stormwater code and manual
adoption revisions. Jeff, can
we get a roll call, please?
>> Brian Halbert.
>> Hi.
>> Mark Bergfeld. Kyle Fadness.
I Ron Barca. I Jack Haroon. I
Alicia Montgomery. I Carl
Johnson. I seven zero.
>> It is motion passes. And
with that said we will now
conclude the public hearing on
this matter. Bringing it back
here next is is there any
unfinished business. Hearing.
None. Is there any new business.
Oh excuse me. Sorry.
>> I don't know if it's
unfinished or new.
>> We'll go.
>> To new. Okay. Several weeks
ago, the council heard and
adopted a. An alternate plan.
And we. I saw that they had a
matrix of how we had voted on
that plan, but I didn't get a
matrix back to see how the
Council voted against. On every
one of those line items. I'm
just wondering, you know, did
they did they modify the plan
or did they adopt it as we had
recommended it?
>> I know that we're probably
putting you on the spot, Jeff,
if you want to just if you
could get us that information,
if that's plausible.
>> I can give you that
information. It is on the
website, but I'll go ahead and
send you the link to the table.
>> Okay. Great.
>> To my understanding, it's
mostly what what you had
recommended with slight
modification.
>> Great. Thank you. Good
question. Okay. Any more new
business?
>> This is Alicia Montgomery.
Just for the record, I was a
few minutes late and missed the
roll call. So for the minutes,
I am here.
>> Any comments from planning
commissioners? Good to see
everybody. Thank you for a
great presentation. Good to
hear you come up and talk to us
about the daycare. With that
said, we are now adjourned